<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
  <title>OttoPi journal</title>
  <link>https://ottopi.com/journal/</link>
  <description>Design, print and events from one studio</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Monomeric or polymeric: choosing a film by how long it has to stay put</title>
    <link>https://ottopi.com/journal/monomeric-or-polymeric-film/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ottopi.com/journal/monomeric-or-polymeric-film/</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 09:00:00 +0300</pubDate>
    <description>Cost per square metre is the wrong first question. Start with the surface curvature and the removal date.</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost every argument about vinyl comes down to price per square metre, and almost every failure comes down to something else entirely: how curved the surface is, and when somebody has to take the graphic off again.</p><h2>What actually differs</h2><p>Monomeric film is calendered with short plasticiser molecules that want to migrate out over time. As they leave, the film shrinks. On a flat panel that shrinkage is invisible. On a compound curve — a vehicle door, a corrugated wall — it pulls the edges back and lifts them, and the graphic starts to look neglected within a year.</p><p>Polymeric film uses longer, more stable plasticisers. It costs more, conforms further, and stays where you put it. That is the entire trade.</p><h2>The three questions worth asking first</h2><ol><li><strong>Is the surface flat?</strong> Flat or gently curved, monomeric is fine. Compound curves, rivets, corrugations — polymeric.</li><li><strong>How long does it stay?</strong> Under a year indoors, monomeric. Multi-year outdoors, polymeric.</li><li><strong>Who removes it, and when?</strong> A graphic left past its life becomes a removal job, and removal labour costs far more than the film ever did.</li></ol><h2>The lamination question</h2><p>A laminate is not an upgrade path. Laminating a monomeric film does not make it behave like a polymeric one; it protects the surface against abrasion and UV but the base film still shrinks. Match the laminate to the film, not the other way round.</p><h2>In practice</h2><p>For a shop window running a six-week campaign, monomeric is the right answer and anything more is wasted money. For a fleet of vans that has to look the same in three years, the extra cost of polymeric is smaller than one re-wrap.</p>]]></content:encoded>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Blueback or blockout: which paper for an outdoor poster</title>
    <link>https://ottopi.com/journal/blueback-or-blockout-posters/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ottopi.com/journal/blueback-or-blockout-posters/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 09:00:00 +0300</pubDate>
    <description>What the blue layer actually does, and when the extra weight of a blockout stock earns its price.</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paste an ordinary poster over an old one and you get both of them. The previous artwork ghosts through, the paste darkens patches unevenly, and the piece you designed is not the piece anybody sees.</p><h2>What blueback does</h2><p>Blueback paper carries a dyed blue layer on the reverse. Blue is the efficient choice because it absorbs the wavelengths that would otherwise bounce back through the sheet. The result is a printed face that stays as designed regardless of what is underneath it — for a small premium over plain poster paper.</p><h2>When you need blockout instead</h2><p>Blockout stock puts an opaque layer between two printed faces. You need it when both sides are printed and visible: hanging banners in an atrium, double-sided pavement signs, anything backlit from behind by daylight.</p><blockquote>If nobody will ever see the back, blueback is enough. If they will, blockout is not optional.</blockquote><h2>The mistake worth avoiding</h2><p>Specifying blockout for a wall-mounted poster. You pay for weight and opacity you cannot see, and the heavier sheet is harder to paste smoothly on a large format.</p>]]></content:encoded>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Ghosting on transfer paper, and the four causes worth checking first</title>
    <link>https://ottopi.com/journal/ghosting-on-transfer-paper/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ottopi.com/journal/ghosting-on-transfer-paper/</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 09:00:00 +0300</pubDate>
    <description>Press pressure, paper weight, fabric tension and dwell time — in the order that solves it fastest.</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ghosting is a faint double image, offset a millimetre or two from the real one, and it means the same thing every time: the paper and the fabric moved relative to each other while the dye was still a gas.</p><h2>1. Pressure, first</h2><p>Uneven or insufficient pressure lets the sheet shift as the press opens. Check the platen across its whole area, not just the centre — most presses are looser at the corners, which is exactly where ghosting shows up first.</p><h2>2. Paper weight</h2><p>Light paper cockles under a heavy ink load. A cockled sheet is no longer flat against the fabric, and the moment the press lifts, it springs. If ghosting appears only on your heaviest coverage, this is usually why.</p><h2>3. Fabric tension</h2><p>Loose fabric moves when the press opens. A tacky spray or heat-resistant tape at the edges costs almost nothing and removes the most common cause on garments.</p><h2>4. Dwell time</h2><p>Over-pressing keeps producing gas after the bond is made, and that gas has nowhere useful to go. If everything else is right and you still see it, take ten seconds off and test again.</p><h2>Work in that order</h2><p>Pressure and paper account for most cases. Changing four variables at once tells you nothing — change one, press a test, and write down what happened.</p>]]></content:encoded>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>